A Multicriteria Optimization for Flight Route Networks in Large-Scale Airlines Using Intelligent Spatial Information.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.11.001

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Geographic information system, Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA), Airway Topology, Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II)

Abstract

Air route network optimization, one of the airspace planning challenges, effectively manages airspace resources toward increasing airspace capacity and reducing air traffic congestion. In this paper, the structure of the flight network in air transport is analyzed with a multi-objective genetic algorithm regarding Geographic Information System (GIS) which is used to optimize this Iran airlines topology to reduce the number of airways and the aggregation of passengers in aviation industries organization and also to reduce changes in airways and the travel time for travelers. The proposed model of this study is based on the combination of two topologies – point-to-point and Hub-and-spoke – with multiple goals for causing a decrease in airways and travel length per passenger and also to reach the minimum number of air stops per passenger. The proposed Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) is tested and assessed in data of the Iran airlines industry in 2018, as an example to real-world applications, to design Iran airline topology. MOGA is proven to be effective in general to solve a network-wide flight trajectory planning. Using the combination of point-to-point and Hub-and-spoke topologies can improve the performance of the MOGA algorithm. Based on Iran airline traffic patterns in 2018, the proposed model successfully decreased 50.8% of air routes (184 air routes) compared to the current situations while the average travel length and the average changes in routes were increased up to 13.8% (about 100 kilometers) and up to 18%, respectively. The proposed algorithm also suggests that the current air routes of Iran can be decreased up to 24.7% (89 airways) if the travel length and the number of changes increase up to 4.5% (32 kilometers) and 5%, respectively. Two intermediate airports were supposed for these experiments. The computational results show the potential benefits of the proposed model and the advantage of the algorithm. The structure of the flight network in air transport can significantly reduce operational cost while ensuring the operation safety. According to the results, this intelligent multi-object optimization model would be able to be successfully used for a precise design and efficient optimization of existing and new airline topologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Fraile, J. Sicilia, R. González, and A. González, “Study of Factors Affecting the Choice Modal of Transportation in an Urban Environment Using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” in Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 357-367.

[2] M. E. O’Kelly, “A quadratic integer program for the location of interacting hub facilities,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 393-404, 1987.

[3] P. Bagga, A. Joshi, and R. Hans, “QoS based Web Service Selection and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 113- 121, 2019.

[4] L. Mei, Z. Yan and J. Shao, “p‐hub median location optimization of hub‐ and‐spoke air transport networks in express enterprise,” Special issue on multimodal information learning and analytics on cross‐media big data, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Wiley Online Library, vol. 31, no. 9, 2019.

[5] O. Lordan, J. M. Sallan and P. Simo, “Study of the topology and robustness of airline route networks from the complex network approach: a survey and research agenda,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 37, pp. 112- 120, 2014.

[6] C. Liu and Q. Gui, “Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014,” Scientometrics, vol. 109, no. 1, p. 159–184, 2016.

[7] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182-197, 2002.

[8] S. Garcia-Rodriguez, “Application of Multiobjective Evolutionary Techniques for Robust Portfolio Optimization,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63-64, 2013.

[9] M. Borhani and N. Ghasemloo, “Soft Computing Modelling of Urban Evolution: Tehran Metropolis,” International Journal of InteractiveMultimedia and Artificial Intelligence, p. In Press, 2020.

[10] A. H. A. Elkasem, S. Kamel, A. Rashad, and F. Jurado, “Optimal Performance of Doubly Fed Induction Generator Wind Farm Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 48-53, 2019.

[11] A. Taibi and B. Atmani, “Combining Fuzzy AHP with GIS and Decision Rules for Industrial Site Selection,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 60-69, 2017.

[12] M. Borhani, “Corpus Analysis Using Relaxed Conjugate Gradient Neural Network Training Algorithm,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 50, no. 1, p. 839–849, 2019.

[13] M. Borhani and H. Ghassemian, “Hyperspectral spatial-spectral feature classification based on adequate adaptive segmentation,” in 2014 Iranian Conference on Intelligent Systems (ICIS), 2014.

[14] J. Sicilia, C. Quemada, B. Royo, and D. Escuín, “An optimization algorithm for solving the rich vehicle routing problem based on Variable Neighborhood Search and Tabu Search metaheuristics,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 291, pp. 468-477, 2016.

[15] A. Fraile, E. Larrodé, A. Magreñan, and J. Sicilia, “Decision model for siting transport and logistic facilities in urban environments,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 291, no. C, pp. 478-487, 2016.

[16] J. Sohn and S. Park, “A linear program for the two-hub location problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 617-622, 1997.

[17] V. Marianov and D. Serra, “Location models for airline hubs behaving as M/D/c queues,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 7, 983–1003.

[18] B. Wagner, “An exact solution procedure for a cluster hub location problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 178, no. 2, p. 391–401, 2007.

[19] M. Mohammadi, F. Jolai and H. Rostami, “An M/M/c queue model for hub covering location problem,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2623-2638, 2011.

[20] S. A. Alumur, H. Yaman and B. Y. Kara, “Hierarchical multimodal hub location problem with time-definite deliveries,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1107- 1120, 2012.

[21] F. Taghipourian, I. Mahdavi, N. Mahdavi-Amiri and A. Makui, “A fuzzy programming approach for dynamic virtual hub location problem,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 3257-3270, 2012.

[22] T. H. Yang and T. Y. Chiu, “Airline hub-and-spoke system design under stochastic demand and hub congestion,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 69-76, 2016.

[23] P. K. Harshavardhan and K. Kousik, “Hierarchical Genetic Algorithms with evolving objective functions,” Neural and Evolutionary Computing, p. arXiv:1812.10308, 2018.

[24] M. Khodemani-Yazdi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Bashiri, and Y. Rahimi, “Solving a new bi-objective hierarchical hub location problem with an M∕M∕c queuing framework,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 78, pp. 53-70, 2019.

[25] D. L. Bryan. and M. E. O’Kelly, “Hub-and-Spoke Networks in Air Transportation: an Analytical Review,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 275-295, 1999.

[26] S. W. C. Morrison, The economic effects of airline deregulation, Washington, DC.:Brookings Institution Press., 2010.

[27] D. E. Goldberg, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1989.

[28] R. L. Haupt and S. E. Haupt, Practical genetic algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

[29] K. Deb, Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-01
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    302
  • PDF
    83

How to Cite

Borhani, M., Akbari, K., Matkan, A., and Tanasan, M. (2020). A Multicriteria Optimization for Flight Route Networks in Large-Scale Airlines Using Intelligent Spatial Information. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.11.001