Spiking Activity of a LIF Neuron in Distributed Delay Framework

Authors

Keywords:

Distributed Computing, Framework, Spiking Activity, Fokker-Planck Equation
Supporting Agencies
The authors are extremely grateful to the reviewers whose comments have led to significant improvement in the quality of the paper.

Abstract

Evolution of membrane potential and spiking activity for a single leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron in distributed delay framework (DDF) is investigated. DDF provides a mechanism to incorporate memory element in terms of delay (kernel) function into a single neuron models. This investigation includes LIF neuron model with two different kinds of delay kernel functions, namely, gamma distributed delay kernel function and hypo-exponential distributed delay kernel function. Evolution of membrane potential for considered models is studied in terms of stationary state probability distribution (SPD). Stationary state probability distribution of membrane potential (SPDV) for considered neuron models are found asymptotically similar which is Gaussian distributed. In order to investigate the effect of membrane potential delay, rate code scheme for neuronal information processing is applied. Firing rate and Fano-factor for considered neuron models are calculated and standard LIF model is used for comparative study. It is noticed that distributed delay increases the spiking activity of a neuron. Increase in spiking activity of neuron in DDF is larger for hypo-exponential distributed delay function than gamma distributed delay function. Moreover, in case of hypo-exponential delay function, a LIF neuron generates spikes with Fano-factor less than 1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] P. Dayan, and L.F. Abbott “Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems”, The MIT Press, 2001.

[2] G.B. Ermentrout, and D.H. Terman, “Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience”, Springer, 2010.

[3] W. Gerstner, R. Naud, “How Good are Neuron Models?” Science, vol. 326, no, 5961, 2009, pp. 379-380.

[4] M.I. Rabinovich, P. Varona, A. I, Selverston, and H.D.I. Abarbanel, “Reviews of Modern Physics”, vol. 78, no. 4, 2006, pp. 1213-1256.

[5] C. Koch, “Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons”, Computational Neuroscience, Oxford University Press, 1998.

[6] A.N. Burkitt, “A Review of the Integrate-and-Fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input”, Biological Cybernatics, vol. 95 no.1, 2006, 1-19.

[7] E.M. Izhikevich, “Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting”, Computational Neuroscience, MIT Press, 2007.

[8] F. Gabbiani, and S.J. Cox, “Mathematics for Neuroscientists”, Academic Press, 2006.

[9] C.F. Lo, and T.K. Chung, “Neural Information Processing: Lecture Notes in Computer Science”, vol. 4232, 2006, pp. 324-331.

[10] Karmeshu, V. Gupta, and K.V. Kadambari, “Neuronal model with Distributed Delay: Analysis and Simulation Study for Gamma Distribution Memory Kernel”, Biological Cybernatics, vol. 104, no. 6, 2011, pp. 369- 383.

[11] S.K. Sharma, and Karmeshu, “Neuronal Model with Distributed Delay: Emergence of Unimodal and Bimodal ISI Distributions”, IEEE Transactions on Nanobiosciences, vol. 12, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1-12.

[12] S.K. Choudhary, K. Singh, and S.K. Bharti, “Variability in spiking pattern of leaky integrate-and-fire neuron due to excitatory and inhibitory potentials”, Computing for Sustainable Global Development

[13] (INDIACom), 2015, pp. 2025–2030.

[14] M. Rudolph, and A. Destexhe, “On the Use of Analytical Expressions for the Voltage Distribution to Analyze Intercellular Recordings”, Neural Computation, vol. 18, 2006, pp. 2917-2922.

[15] S. Ruan, and R.S. Filfil, “Dynamics of a Two-Neuron System with Discrete and Distributed Delays”, Physica D, vol. 191, 2004, 323-342.

[16] R.B. Northrop, “Introduction to Dynamic Modeling of Neuro-Sensory Systems”, CRC Press, 2000.

[17] Srdjan Ostojic, “Two types of asynchronous activity in networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons”, Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 594-602. 2014.

[18] N. Ho, and A. Destexhe, “Synaptic Background Activity Enhances the Responsiveness of Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons”, The American Physiological Society, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 1488-1496.

[19] A. Destexhe, and D. Pare, “Impact of Network Activity on the Integrative Properties of Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons In Vivo”, The American Physiological Society, vol. 81, no. 4, 1999, pp. 1531-1547.

[20] A.N. Burkitt, “A Review of the Integrate-and-Fire Neuron Model: II. Inhomogeneous Synaptic Input and Network Properties”, Biological Cybernatics, vol. 95, no. 2, 2006, pp. 97-112.

[21] T.D. Frank, “Nonlinear Fokker-Planck Equations: Fundamentals and Applications”, Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, 2005.

[22] F.Y.M. Wan, and H.C. Tuckwell, “Neuronal Firing and Input Variability”, Journal of Theoretical Neurobiology, vol. 1, 1982, pp. 197-218.

[23] M.P. Nawrot, C. Boucsein, V.M. Rodriguez, A. Riehle, and A.A.S. Rotter, “Measurement of Variability Dynamics in Cortical Spike Trains”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 169, 2008, 374 390.

[24] F. Rieke, D. Warland, R.R. Steveninck, and W. Bialek, “Spikes: Exploring The Neural Code”, MIT Press, 1997.

[25] A.B. Arcas, A.L. Fairhall, and W. Bialek, “Computation in a Single Neuron: Hodgkin and Huxley Revisited”, Neural Computation, vol.15, 2003, pp. 1715-1749.

[26] A. Fairhall, E.S. Brown, and A. Barreiro, “Information Theoretic Approaches to Understanding Circuit Function”, Neurobiology, vol. 22, 2012, pp. 653-659.

[27] S. Haykin, J.C. Principe, T.J. Sejnowski, and J. Mcwhirter, “New Directions in Statistical Signal Processing: From Systems to Brains”, MIT Press, 2007.

[28] S. Sinanovic, and D.H. Johnson, “Toward a theory of information processing”, Signal Processing, vol. 87, 2007, pp. 1326-1344.

[29] W. Gerstner, A.K. Kreiter, H. Markram, and A.V.M. Herz, “Neural Code: Firing Rate and Beyond”, Proceedings National Academy of Science, USA, vol. 94, 1997, 12740-12741.

[30] W. Gerstner, and W.M. Kistler, “Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity”, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

[31] U.T. Eden, and M.A. Kramer, “Drawing Inferences from Fano Factor Calculations”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 190, 2010, pp. 149- 152.

[32] D.J. Higham, “An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations”, SIAM Review, vol. 46, no. 3, 2001, pp. 525-546.

[33] P. Glasserman, “Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering”, Springer, 2004.

[34] W. Maass, “Noise as a Resource for Computation and Learning in Networks of Spiking Neurons”, Proceedings of the IEEE , Vol. 102, No. 5, 2014, pp. 860-880.

[35] H. Lim, V. Kornijcuk, J. Y. Seok, S. K. Kim, I. Kim, C. S. Hwang and D. S. Jeong, “Reliability of neuronal information conveyed by unreliable neuristorbased leaky integrate-and-fire neurons: a model study”, Nature: Scientific Reports 5, 5, Article number: 9776, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-01
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    36
  • PDF
    33

How to Cite

Choudhary, S. K., Singh, K., and Solanki, V. K. (2016). Spiking Activity of a LIF Neuron in Distributed Delay Framework. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 3(7), 70–76. Retrieved from https://www.ijimai.org/index.php/ijimai/article/view/6041