Trust Levels Definition On Virtual Learning Platforms Through Semantic Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2010.134Keywords:
Web Services, Trust-Levels, FOAF, OntologiesAbstract
Trust level concept is a topic that has opened a knowledge area about the profile evaluation and the people participation in Social Networks. These have presented a high knowledge profit, but at the same time it is necessary to analyze a group of variables to determine the trust participants' degree. In addition, this is a topic that from some years ago has been presenting a big expectation to settle some alternatives to generate confidence in an activer community on internet. To establish these parameters it is important to define a model to abstract some variables that are involved in this process. For this, it is relevant to take into account the semantic languages as one of the alternatives that allow these kinds of activities. The purpose of this article is to analyze the Trust Levels definition in the contents that are shared on Open Source Virtual learning Platforms through the use of a model of representation of semantic languages. The last ones allow determining the trust in the use of learning objects that are shared in this kind of platforms.Downloads
References
[1] P. Zimmermann, "The official PGP user's guide," 1995.
[2] D. Fensel and C. Bussler, "The web service modeling framework WSMF," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 113-137, 2002.
[3] P. Gaona, et al., "Modelo informático para autenticidad de contenidos mediante el concepto de Web of Trust sobre plataformas virtuales LCMS. LACCEI," p. 10, 2010.
[4] R. Allen, "Open Image Systems Inc., United Kingdom Chair, WfMC External Relations Committee;“The Workflow Handbook 2001”; Workflow Management Coalition," ed: October, 2001.
[5] C. Prior, "Workflow Handbook," Maestro BPE Pty Limited, Australia, 2005.
[6] D. Hollingsworth, "Workflow management coalition: The workflow reference model," Workflow Management Coalition, 1993.
[7] A. SCORM, "Documentation 2005," ed, 2004.
[8] G. Santos, "Secuenciamiento de actividades educativas orientado a la reutilización y la auto-organización en tutoría inteligente," 2007.
[9] R. McGreal, "Learning objects: A practical definition," INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY, p. 21, 2004.
[10] D. Wiley and E. Edwards, "Online Self-Organizing Social Systems: The Decentralized Future of Online Learning," Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 3, pp. 33-46, 2002.
[11] A. Nadalin, et al., "WS-Trust 1.3," OASIS Standard, March, 2007.
[12] E. Cerami and S. Laurent, Web services essentials: O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2002.
[13] W. Ford, et al., "Xml key management specification (xkms)," Retrieved from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-xkms-20010330, 2001.
[14] E. Gordo and J. Soto, "Autenticidad basada en la Web Semántica de confianza," IJIMAI, 2007.
[15] D. Brickley and L. Miller, "FOAF vocabulary specification 0.91," Namespace document, FOAF Project (November 2007) http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1, 2007.
[16] N. Noy, et al., "User ratings of ontologies: Who will rate the raters," 2005.
[17] D. McGuinness and F. Van Harmelen, "OWL web ontology language overview," W3C recommendation, vol. 10, pp. 2004-03, 2004.
[18] A. Gómez-Pérez, et al., Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web: Springer Verlag, 2004.
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract93
-
PDF46
Submit Article
Information
