Quantitative Measures for Medical Fundus and Mammography Images Enhancement.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2022.12.002Keywords:
Contrast, Medical Images, MammogramAbstract
Enhancing the visibility of medical images is part of the initial or preprocessing phase within a computer vision system. This image preparation is essential for subsequent system tasks such as segmentation or classification. Therefore, quantitative validation of medical image preprocessing is crucial. In this work, four metrics are studied: Contrast Improvement Index (CII), Enhancement Measurement Estimation (EME), Entropy EME (EMEE), and Entropy. The objective is to find the best parameters for each metric. The study is performed on five medical image datasets, three retinal fundus sets (DRIVE, ROPFI, HRF-POORQ), and two mammography image sets (MIAS, DDSM). Metrics are calculated using a binary mask image to discard the background. Using the fundus and mask datasets, the best results were obtained with the EMEE and EMEE metrics, which achieved mean improvements of up to 186% and 75%, respectively. For mammography datasets and using masks of the region of interest, the two metrics with the highest percentage improvement were CII and EMEE, which obtained means of up to 396% and 129%, respectively. Based on the experimental results provided, we can conclude that EMEE, EME, and CII metrics can achieve better enhancement assessment in this type of medical imaging.
Downloads
References
Y. Boutiche, “Fast level set algorithm for extraction and evaluation of weld defects in radiographic images,” Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 672, pp. 51–68, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46245-5_4.
X. Chen, “Image enhancement effect on the performance of convolutional neural networks”, M.S. thesis, Faculty of Computing, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104319.
T. Rahman, et. al, “Exploring the effect of image enhancement techniques on COVID-19 detection using chest X-ray images”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 132, 2021.
H. Qu, T. Yuan, Z. Sheng, and Y. Zhang, “A Pedestrian Detection Method Based on YOLOv3 Model and Image Enhanced by Retinex,” Proceedings - 2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, CISP-BMEI 2018, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2018.8633119.
D. A. Pitaloka, A. Wulandari, T. Basaruddin, and D. Y. Liliana, “Enhancing CNN with Preprocessing Stage in Automatic Emotion Recognition,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 116, pp. 523–529, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2017.10.038.
E. Vocaturo, E. Zumpano and P. Veltri, “Image pre-processing in computer vision systems for melanoma detection,” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2018, pp. 2117-2124, doi: 10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621507.
J. P. Gu, L. Hua, X. Wu, H. Yang, and Z. T. Zhou, “Color medical image enhancement based on adaptive equalization of intensity numbers matrix histogram,” International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 551–558, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11633-014-0871-9.
M. M. G. Ribeiro, and A. J. P. Gomes, “RGBeat: A Recoloring Algorithm for Deutan and Protan Dichromats,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, In Press, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2022.01.003.
D. R. Flatla, K. Reinecke, C. Gutwin, and K. Z. Gajos, “SPRWeb: preserving subjective responses to website colour schemes through automatic recolouring,” in Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI’13). ACM, 2013, pp. 2069–2078, doi: 10.1145/2470654.2481283.
X. Xu, Y. Wang, J. Tang, X. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Robust automatic focus algorithm for low contrast images using a new contrast measure,” Sensors, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 8281–8294, 2011, doi: 10.3390/s110908281.
S. Chen, C. Wang, I. Tai, K. W, Y. Chen, and K. Hsieh, “Modified YOLOv4-DenseNet Algorithm for Detection of Ventricular Septal Defects in Ultrasound Images,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 101–108, 2021, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2021.06.001.
S. Wu, Q. Zhu, Y. Yang, and Y. Xie, “Feature and contrast enhancement of mammographic image based on multiscale analysis and morphology,” 2013 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, ICIA 2013, vol. 2013, pp. 521–526, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICInfA.2013.6720354.
A. Pandey and S. Singh, “New performance metric for quantitative evaluation of enhancement in mammograms,” Proceedings of the 2013 2nd International Conference on Information Management in the Knowledge Economy, IMKE 2013, pp. 51–56, 2014.
G. Du et al., “A new method for detecting architectural distortion in mammograms by nonsubsampled contourlet transform and improved PCNN,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 22, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9224916.
S. Gupta and R. Porwal, “Appropriate Contrast Enhancement Measures for Brain and Breast Cancer Images,” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2016, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.1155/2016/4710842.
A. Albiol, A. Corbi, and F. Albiol, “Automatic intensity windowing of mammographic images based on a perceptual metric,” Medical Physics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1369–1378, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1002/MP.12144.
A. Albiol, A. Corbi, and F. Albiol, “Measuring X-ray image quality using a perceptual metric,” 2016 Global Medical Engineering Physics Exchanges/ Pan American Health Care Exchanges, GMEPE/PAHCE 2016, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1109/GMEPE-PAHCE.2016.7504639.
K. Aurangzeb, S. Aslam, M. Alhussein, R. A. Naqvi, M. Arsalan, and S. I. Haider, “Contrast Enhancement of Fundus Images by Employing Modified PSO for Improving the Performance of Deep Learning Models,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068477.
K. L. Nisha, S. G., P. S. Sathidevi, P. Mohanachandran, and A. Vinekar, “A computer-aided diagnosis system for plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity with structure adaptive segmentation and vessel based features,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 74, pp. 72–94, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.04.003.
M. Intriago-Pazmino, J. Ibarra-Fiallo, J. Crespo, and R. Alonso-Calvo, “Enhancing vessel visibility in fundus images to aid the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity,” Health Informatics Journal, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1460458220935369.
S. S. Agaian, K. P. Lentz, A. M. Grigoryan, S. S. Agaian, K. P. Lentz, and A. M. Grigoryan, “A New Measure of Image Enhancement,” IASTED International Conference on Signal Processing & Communication, no. January 2000, pp. 19–22, 2000.
R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 4th ed. New York: Pearson, 2018.
J. Staal, M. D. Abramoff, M. Niemeijer, M. A. Viergever, and B. van Ginneken, “Ridge-Based Vessel Segmentation in Color Images of the Retina,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 501–509, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1109/TMI.2004.825627.
A. Budai, R. Bock, A. Maier, J. Hornegger, and G. Michelson, “Robust vessel segmentation in fundus images,” International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, vol. 2013, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/154860.
J. Suckling, J; Parker, J; Dance, D; Astley, S; Hutt, I; Boggis, C; Ricketts, I; Stamatakis, E; Cerneaz, N; Kok, S; Taylor, P; Betal, D; Savage, “The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 13, pp. 375–378, 1994.
K. Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Kegelmeyer, W. P., Moore, R., Sallam, M., Chang, K., Woods, “HeathEtAl2001_DDSMdataset,” in In Third international workshop on digital mammography, 1996, p. 27.
R. Szeliski, Image formation, vol. 73. 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-2014
K. Zuiderveld, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization. Academic Press, Inc., 1994. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-336156-1.50061-6.
N. Arora and G. Aggarwal, “Mammogram Classification Using Genetic Algorithmbased Feature Selection,” International Journal of Research in Electronics and Computer Engineering a Unit of I2OR, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 378–379, 2018.
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract223
-
PDF33






