Adaptation of the AIlessphobia Scale in Education in a Sample of Spanish Adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2026.2258Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Education, Nomophobia, Phobia, ScaleAbstract
The exponential growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has given rise to a new phenomenon: AIlessphobia, the fear of lacking access to AI for educational tasks. To measure this emerging construct, a specific instrument is needed. Therefore, this study aimed to validate a Spanish version of an AIlessphobia assessment scale for adolescents. The research involved 1,905 (49.2% boys) students aged 11-14 from 26 schools (mean age 12.60±0.82 years). Results revealed that 64.4% of participants had used AI applications or websites, primarily for academic purposes. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated adequate fit indices for a two-factor correlated model and sex invariance. The scale showed high item-total correlations, satisfactory factor loadings, and strong reliability indicators. A positive correlation was found between AIlessphobia and nomophobia. No significant sex differences were observed across Secondary Education courses. Scores between 18-22 points per dimension or above 36 points total could indicate problematic levels. The study concludes by discussing practical implications and educational needs.
Downloads
References
[1] M. McLuhan, “La aldea global: transformaciones en la vida y los medios de comunicación mundiales en el siglo XX: The global village: transformations in world life and media in the 20th century”. Editorial Gedisa, 2015.
[2] J. E. Mendoza, S. J. J. Sánchez, and L. F. J. Cañarte, “Implicaciones éticas en el uso de inteligencia artificial en estudiantes universitarios [Ethical implications in the use of artificial intelligence in university students],” Polo del Conocimiento, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 877–904, 2024, https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v9i3.6691
[3] Statista, “Consumo mundial de smartphones.” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://es.statista.com/temas/10145/industria-y-consumo-mundial-desmartphones/
[4] U. C. Öztürk, “Netlessfobia” Stay in Connection or Not That is The All Fear: Fear of Being Without Internet and Organizational Reflections,” Journal of International Social Research, vol. 8, no. 37, pp. 629–629, Apr. 2015, https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20153710629
[5] C. Yildirim and A.-P. Correia, “Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 49, pp. 130–137, Aug. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059
[6] A. C. León-Mejía, M. Gutiérrez-Ortega, I. Serrano-Pintado, and J. González-Cabrera, “A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 5, p. e0250509, May 2021, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250509
[7] J. González-Cabrera and J. M. Machimbarrena, “Quality of Life and Its Relationship with Bullying and Cyberbullying,” in Handbook of Anger, Aggression, and Violence, C. Martin, V. R. Preedy, and V. B. Patel, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98711-4_171-1
[8] D. M. Gezgin and T. T. Kurtça, “Developing the AIlessphobia in education scale and examining its psychometric characteristics,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 4471–4491, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12984-6
[9] L. Floridi, Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Herder Editorial, 2024.
[10] N. Saif, S. U. Khan, I. Shaheen, F. A. ALotaibi, M. M. Alnfiai, and M. Arif, “Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 154, p. 108097, May 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097
[11] R. Wu and Z. Yu, “Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 10–33, Jan. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334
[12] C. K. Y. Chan and K. K. W. Lee, “The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 60, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
[13] S. Atlas, “ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AI.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548
[14] N. Dehouche and K. Dehouche, “What’s in a text-to-image prompt? The potential of stable diffusion in visual arts education,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e16757, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16757
[15] J. P. Andersen et al., “Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions,” Technology in Society, vol. 81, p. 102813, Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813
[16] J. S. Jauhiainen and A. Garagorry Guerra, “Generative AI and education: dynamic personalization of pupils’ school learning material with ChatGPT,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, p. 1288723, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
[17] T. K. F. Chiu, Q. Xia, X. Zhou, C. S. Chai, and M. Cheng, “Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100118, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
[18] M. Loján, J. Romero, D. Aguilera, and A. Romero, “Consecuencias de la Dependencia de la Inteligencia Artificial en Habilidades Críticas y Aprendizaje Autónomo en los Estudiantes [Consequences of Artificial Intelligence Dependence on Critical Skills and Autonomous Learning in Students],” Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2368–2382, 2024.
[19] S. S. Shah and M. M. Asad, “Impact of critical thinking approach on learners’ dependence on innovative transformation through artificial intelligence,” in The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges, Risks, and Ethical Considerations, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2024, pp. 161–182.
[20] K. Salmela-Aro, “Stages of Adolescence,” in Encyclopedia of Adolescence, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00043-0
[21] Empantallados, “El impacto de la AI en la educación en España [The impact of AI on education in Spain].” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://empantallados.com/ia/
[22] X. Zhang, M. Yin, M. Zhang, Z. Li, and H. Li, “The Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Dependence Scale,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 126–131, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0240
[23] Z. Deng and Z. Deng, “Becoming a cognitive miser? Antecedents and consequences of addictive ChatGPT use,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 383, p. 118467, Oct. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118467
[24] S. Livingstone, K. Ólafsson, E. J. Helsper, F. Lupiáñez-Villanueva, G. A. Veltri, and F. Folkvord, “Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks for Children Online: The Role of Digital Skills in Emerging Strategies of Parental Mediation: Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks,” Journal of Communication, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 82–105, Feb. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
[25] D. Sevilla-Fernández, A. Díaz-López, V. Caba-Machado, J. M. Machimbarrena, J. Ortega-Barón, and J. González-Cabrera, “Parental mediation and the use of social networks: A systematic review,” PLoS ONE, vol. 20, no. 2, p. e0312011, Feb. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312011
[26] M. Brand et al., “The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 104, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032
[27] A. Klingbeil, C. Grützner, and P. Schreck, “Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 160, p. 108352, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352
[28] C. Montag and J. D. Elhai, “The darker side of positive AI attitudes: Investigating associations with (problematic) social media use,” Addictive Behaviors Reports, vol. 22, p. 100613, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100613
[29] A. Hernández, M. Hidalgo, R. Hambleton, and J. Gómez-Benito, “International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist,” Psicothema, vol. 3, no. 32, pp. 390–398, Aug. 2020, https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306
[30] “ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition),” International Journal of Testing, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 101–134, Apr. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
[31] V. Caba-Machado, J. M. Machimbarrena, A. Díaz-López, D. SevillaFernández, C. Pérez-Sancho, and J. González-Cabrera, “Nomophobia Questionnaire Short-Form: Psychometric Properties and Longitudinal Association with Anxiety, Stress, and Depression in Adolescents,” International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 4585–4595, Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2215626
[32] L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, Jan. 1999, https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[33] G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold, “Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 233–255, Apr. 2002, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
[34] E. Ortega-Ochoa, J.-M. Sabaté, M. Arguedas, J. Conesa, T. Daradoumis, and S. Caballé, “Exploring the utilization and deficiencies of Generative Artificial Intelligence in students’ cognitive and emotional needs: a systematic mini-review,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1493566
[35] S. Carcelén-García, M. J. Narros-González, and M. Galmes-Cerezo, “Digital vulnerability in young people: gender, age and online participation patterns,” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 2287115, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2287115
[36] K. V. C. Cabrera-Loayza, “Transformando la Educación Básica: Retos y Perspectivas de la Inteligencia Artificial,” Revista Científica de Salud y Desarrollo Humano, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.61368/r.s.d.h.v5i2.113
[37] S. S. Shah and M. M. Asad, “Impact of Critical Thinking Approach on Learners’ Dependence on Innovative Transformation Through Artificial Intelligence,” in The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education, M. D. Lytras, A. Alkhaldi, S. Malik, A. C. Serban, and T. Aldosemani, Eds., Emerald Publishing Limited, 2024, pp. 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-486-820241010
[38] M. Del Cisne Loján, J. Antonio Romero, D. Sancho Aguilera, and A. Yajaira Romero, “Consecuencias de la Dependencia de la Inteligencia Artificial en Habilidades Críticas y Aprendizaje Autónomo en los Estudiantes,” Ciencia Latina, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2368–2382, Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i2.10678
[39] J. Billieux, A. Schimmenti, Y. Khazaal, P. Maurage, and A. Heeren, “Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research,” Journal of Behavioral Addictions, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 119–123, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.009
[40] D. Kardefelt-Winther et al., “How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?: How to conceptualize behavioral addiction,” Addiction, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 1709–1715, Oct. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13763
[41] J. Billieux, M. Flayelle, and D. L. King, “Addiction: expand diagnostic borders with care,” Nature, vol. 611, no. 7937, pp. 665–665, Nov. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03760-y
[42] V. Ciudad-Fernández, C. Von Hammerstein, and J. Billieux, “People are not becoming ‘AIholic’: Questioning the ‘ChatGPT addiction’ construct,” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 166, p. 108325, Jul. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108325
[43] L. Fournier et al., “Deconstructing the components model of addiction: an illustration through ‘addictive’ use of social media,” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 143, p. 107694, Aug. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107694
[44] A. Nogueira-López, A. Rial-Boubeta, I. Guadix-García, V. J. VillanuevaBlasco, and J. Billieux, “Prevalence of problematic Internet use and problematic gaming in Spanish adolescents,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 326, p. 115317, Aug. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115317
[45] J. Von Garrel and J. Mayer, “Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 799, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
[46] The Nordic Youth Barometer, “Back2School.” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://info.ungdomsbarometern.se/publika-rapporter/back2school-2023
[47] J. Klarin, E. Hoff, A. Larsson, and D. Daukantaitė, “Adolescents’ use and perceived usefulness of generative AI for schoolwork: exploring their relationships with executive functioning and academic achievement,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, p. 1415782, Aug. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1415782
[48] J. Ortega-Barón, J. González-Cabrera, J. M. Machimbarrena, and I. Montiel, “Safety.Net: A Pilot Study on a Multi-Risk Internet Prevention Program,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 8, p. 4249, Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084249
[49] J. Ortega-Barón, J. M. Machimbarrena, A. Díaz-López, V. Caba-Machado, B. Tejero, and J. González-Cabrera, “Eficacia de un programa de prevención multirriesgo en internet: Safety.net,” Revista de Psicodidáctica, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 97–106, Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2024.01.004
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract65
-
PDF28






